RedC - CLM-Community - Technical Pages

03/05/2018

05:10 PM Forum INT2LM: RE: "Int2lm" error with starter "cclm-sp_2.7.tgz" on mistral

I cannot see any error in the namelist settings. Have you tried irefatm=2? Does this give the same error?
The warnin...

02/28/2018

11:06 PM Forum CCLM: RE: NaN values in YUPRMASS etc

I run a test on 0.12 for your San Francisco region with cosmo_131108_5.00_clm10. I encountered no problems.
Please f...

02/27/2018

07:35 PM Forum CCLM: RE: NaN values in YUPRMASS etc

There are several differences to the 0.11 version I use, see the attached YUSPECIF and compare it with yours. However...

06:29 PM Forum CCLM: RE: NaN values in YUPRMASS etc

Can you provide the related YUSPECIF file, too? Which versions of CCLM and INT2LM do you use?

02/26/2018

04:57 PM Forum CCLM: RE: NaN values in YUPRMASS etc

Adhoc I see that you use @itype_gscp=4@ for the 0.12 simulation. I do not know if this namelist setting works for su...

12/11/2017

01:57 PM Forum General Questions: RE: Output variables not found in the GRIB table

The GRIBOUT definitions seem to be fine. However, you used output file format ytunit='f' instead of ytunit='d'. I am ...

09:59 AM Forum General Questions: RE: ERA5 for nesting

CAF files for 2010-2016 have already been produced. Presently a test simulation is running in order to find eventuall...

11/09/2017

04:45 PM Forum CCLM: RE: Evergreen and deciduous forest fractions: inconsistencies?

I just looked at the EXTPAR source code. As far as I understand now I have misinterpreted the sentence
_Values that ...

11/08/2017

02:44 PM Forum CCLM: RE: Evergreen and deciduous forest fractions: inconsistencies?

In the EXTPAR v4.0 documentation on page 19 it reads:
_Values that depend on the plant cover, such as PLCOV MX, PLCO...

10/18/2017

10:14 AM Forum CCLM: RE: strange problem in cclm

Since you wrote that the starter package tests work, you may try to make your changes step by step from the starter p...